Specialist language services for technical, regulated and high-stakes content—combining experienced linguists, practical technology and human quality control.

Specialist linguists preserve meaning, terminology and tone when nuance carries real weight.
02A controlled workflow option selected around confidentiality, risk, audience and quality needs.
03Light or full human post-editing with a scope that is agreed before production begins.
04Interface, resource and help content adapted while preserving variables, structure and context.
05Independent linguistic review for accuracy, fluency, consistency and audience fit.
06Human verification supported by automated checks for terminology, tags, numbers and formatting.

Claims, specifications and technical terminology handled as one consistent system.
LIFMedical and pharmaceutical content treated with the care high-stakes information requires.
LEGPrecise documents with controlled terminology, version discipline and confidentiality.
ENGComplex manuals and specifications translated by specialists who understand the subject.
SFTProduct language built to work inside interfaces, release cycles and technical constraints.
GAMPlayer-facing language, interface text and terminology aligned across the experience.
MKTMessages adapted for local readers—not simply moved word for word.
A dedicated project manager connects the people, tools and decisions behind every delivery.
Linguists are matched by subject matter and document type, not language alone.
Questions, priorities and risks have a clear owner throughout the project.
Translation memories and terminology databases help approved language remain consistent.
NDA, AI/MT permission and human-only preferences form part of project intake.
Automated checks support—but do not replace—linguistic and project-manager judgement.
Files, languages, audience, risk and deadline.
Terminology, references and workflow decisions.
Specialist production using agreed tools.
Human review, automated QA and PM checks.
Final package, feedback and asset updates.
AI and machine translation are workflow options—not automatic defaults. We consider confidentiality, content risk, audience, terminology and intended use first.
The appropriate level depends on the content—not a fixed technology preference.
Timing depends on file complexity, language requirements and deadline. Send the files and intended use; a project manager will review the material and respond with the next steps. The current website states a 30-minute response target, but this should be reconfirmed before being published as a service commitment.
Yepanoff historically works across major Slavic, Western and Eastern European, Caucasian and Middle Eastern languages. Exact source and target availability is confirmed for each project so the right specialist can be assigned.
Select ‘NDA required’ in the quote form. The project team will confirm the applicable agreement and handling requirements before files move into production.
Only as an agreed workflow option. Content type, confidentiality, risk, audience and required quality are considered first. You can request a human-only workflow.
Yes. Choose human-only in the quote form or state the restriction in your brief. This preference should also cover any third-party machine translation processing.
The quote interface accepts common office and localisation formats for assessment. Actual production compatibility is confirmed after file analysis, particularly for structured or proprietary formats.
The quote process records NDA and AI-processing preferences. Specific retention, deletion, storage and data-residency commitments are confirmed for the project; see the security page for the questions Yepanoff addresses.
The workflow can combine specialist linguist selection, terminology preparation, translation memory, independent review, automated QA and final project-manager verification. The exact layers depend on risk and intended use.